From chd_1 at nktelco.net  Mon Apr  1 13:09:25 2002
From: chd_1 at nktelco.net (Chuck Dickman)
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 22:09:25 -0500
Subject: [pups] 2.11BSD and KFQSA
Message-ID: <3CA7CF65.C71C1D41@nktelco.net>

HI!
After a week or so of trying, I finally got 2.11BSD to recognize a KFQSA
in a PDP-11/73. The problem seems to be that 2.11BSD sets an MSCP packet
length of 64 bytes, but the KFQSA must have this field set to 60 bytes.
There is some confusion about if the header is part of the packet or
not. For the KFQSA, it is not included in the length. After that, life
is good........

Unfortunately I trashed my 2.11BSD installation in the process. :-( I
did a backup I think.....

Anyway, KFQSA modules are not that expensive and RF drives are pretty
cheap, so it is another solution to the lack of disk drives for QBus
PDPs. As long as you have a VAX for configuration. A 390MB RF71 is a
useful size for 2.11BSD.

After I get things put back together, I will send off a patch to sms for
the next release.... :-)

-chuck


From jcampbell at ins-msi.com  Mon Apr  1 22:43:07 2002
From: jcampbell at ins-msi.com (Jeff Campbell)
Date: Mon, 01 Apr 2002 07:43:07 -0500
Subject: [pups] 2.11BSD and KFQSA
References: <3CA7CF65.C71C1D41@nktelco.net>
Message-ID: <3CA855DB.C0C778C6@ins-msi.com>

Chuck Dickman wrote:
> 
> HI!
> After a week or so of trying, I finally got 2.11BSD to recognize a KFQSA
> in a PDP-11/73. The problem seems to be that 2.11BSD sets an MSCP packet
> length of 64 bytes, but the KFQSA must have this field set to 60 bytes.

The correct command packet length is 48 decimal or 060 octal bytes.
End message packets also are this size unless error logging has been
turned on during controller initialization. Then response packets should
be 384 bytes long.

> There is some confusion about if the header is part of the packet or
> not. For the KFQSA, it is not included in the length. After that, life
> is good........
> 
> Unfortunately I trashed my 2.11BSD installation in the process. :-( I
> did a backup I think.....
> 
> Anyway, KFQSA modules are not that expensive and RF drives are pretty
> cheap, so it is another solution to the lack of disk drives for QBus
> PDPs. As long as you have a VAX for configuration. A 390MB RF71 is a
> useful size for 2.11BSD.
> 
> After I get things put back together, I will send off a patch to sms for
> the next release.... :-)
> 
> -chuck
> _______________________________________________
> PUPS mailing list
> PUPS at minnie.tuhs.org
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/pups

Jeff Campbell
n8wxs at arrl.net


From frank at wortner.com  Wed Apr  3 05:40:16 2002
From: frank at wortner.com (Frank Wortner)
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 14:40:16 -0500
Subject: [pups] PDP/11 Emulator for MacOS 9?
Message-ID: <B8CF734F.4814%frank@wortner.com>

Since I'm no longer employed,  I don't have access to any Unix or Windows
boxes to run a PDP/11 emulator.  I do have my home computer: a G4 Mac
running MacOS 9.1.  Are there any precompiled PDP/11 emulator binaries out
there?  I've found a nice PDP/8 emulator,  but so far the PDP/11 has eluded
me.  I'd like to be able to boot up PDP/11 Unix when the nostalgia urge hits
me.

Oh, BTW,  if you know of any jobs in the New York City (NY, NY USA) area for
a 20-year veteran system administrator,  I'd love to hear from you!
-- 
Frank

"They haven't got Brains,  any of them,  only grey fluff that's blown into
their heads by mistake,  and they don't Think."
* Eeyore,  "The House at Pooh Corner"




From asmodai at unixware.org.uk  Wed Apr  3 08:38:36 2002
From: asmodai at unixware.org.uk (asmodai at unixware.org.uk)
Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 22:38:36 +0000
Subject: [pups] Interesting PDP/Xenix History
Message-ID: <OFA055BEB6.79B92071-ON80256B8F.007C1139-80256B8F.0076E01D@unixware.org.uk>

I wrote to SCO/Caldera a while back about this one...   Here's a quote 
from the mail I got in reply:

"XENIX will never be released under any license, as it is too full of 
Microsoft copyrights, and "sanitizing" the source to remove such code 
would render the product useless, and would be a MASSIVE undertaking."

Looks like we wont get Xenix in source format unless Microsoft want us to 
have it.

Regards,
Paul.
"The major difference between a thing that might go wrong and a thing that 
cannot possibly go wrong is that when a thing that cannot possibly go 
wrong goes wrong it usually turns out to be impossible to get at or 
repair" - Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy





Robert Tillyard <rob at vetsystems.com>
Sent by: pups-admin at minnie.tuhs.org
03/25/2002 10:38

 
        To:     pups at minnie.tuhs.org
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [pups] Interesting PDP/Xenix History


Frank Wortner wrote:
> 
> on 3/23/02 11:26 PM, Warren Toomey at wkt at minnie.tuhs.org wrote:
> 
> > In article by Martin Crehan:
> >>  From a thread on Slashdot about Microsoft's Ancient History w/Unix
> >> http://slashdot.org/articles/02/03/23/1422243.shtml?tid=130
> >>
> >>   First Unix/Xenix (Score:1)
> >> by presearch on Saturday March 23, @01:58PM (#3213453)
> >> (User #214913 Info)
> >
> > I've left a comment in the thread asking if they would
> > donate a copy of the tape's contents to our Archive.
> 
> I also remember running PDP/11 Xenix.  The article is basically correct,
> although Microsoft (or HCR) did add a working paging system that enabled
> simulation of split I&D on small PDP/11s like the 11/23, 11/34, and 
11/40.
> I also remember that my copy of the installation document had been 
printed
> by Microsoft's PDP/10 (referred to as the "Microsoft Heating Plant" :-) 
in
> the printout).   I wish I still had the tape and that printout.  Sigh 
...
> 
> --
> Frank

Would SCO->Caldera have copies of this? SCO did the Intel port of Xenix
so they would probably have started with the PDP source. Would tapes be
copyright to Microsoft?

I doubt that they would release the source for the Intel version as it
is still in use today although I don't think that SCO/Caldera will sell
it anymore.

Rob.
_______________________________________________
PUPS mailing list
PUPS at minnie.tuhs.org
http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/pups


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20020402/ef0272d6/attachment.html>

From frank at wortner.com  Wed Apr  3 13:31:40 2002
From: frank at wortner.com (Frank Wortner)
Date: Tue, 02 Apr 2002 22:31:40 -0500
Subject: [pups] Interesting PDP/Xenix History
In-Reply-To: <OFA055BEB6.79B92071-ON80256B8F.007C1139-80256B8F.0076E01D@unixware.org.uk>
Message-ID: <B8CFE1CC.4831%frank@wortner.com>

on 4/2/02 5:38 PM, asmodai at unixware.org.uk at asmodai at unixware.org.uk wrote:


> I wrote to SCO/Caldera a while back about this one...   Here's a quote from
> the mail I got in reply:
> 
"XENIX will never be released under any license, as it is too full of
Microsoft copyrights...²

Well,  there¹s always the possibility that Microsoft could see fit to make a
³hobby² PDP/11 XENIX license available.  Why not?
-- 
Frank

"Don't Blame Me."
* Eeyore,  "Winnie the Pooh"


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20020402/3f385d5c/attachment.html>

From asmodai at unixware.org.uk  Wed Apr  3 19:49:33 2002
From: asmodai at unixware.org.uk (asmodai at unixware.org.uk)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 09:49:33 +0000
Subject: [pups] Interesting PDP/Xenix History
Message-ID: <OFCA0C43CA.6A8DE3D6-ON80256B90.0035EC35-80256B90.00307626@unixware.org.uk>

Frank Wortner <frank at wortner.com>
Sent by: pups-admin at minnie.tuhs.org
04/03/2002 04:31

 
        To:     <asmodai at unixware.org.uk>, <pups at minnie.tuhs.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [pups] Interesting PDP/Xenix History


on 4/2/02 5:38 PM, asmodai at unixware.org.uk at asmodai at unixware.org.uk 
wrote:


I wrote to SCO/Caldera a while back about this one...   Here's a quote 
from the mail I got in reply: 

"XENIX will never be released under any license, as it is too full of 
Microsoft copyrights...?

Well,  there?s always the possibility that Microsoft could see fit to make 
a ?hobby? PDP/11 XENIX license available.  Why not?

-- 
Frank

"Don't Blame Me."
* Eeyore,  "Winnie the Pooh"


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20020403/630b9506/attachment.html>

From asmodai at unixware.org.uk  Wed Apr  3 19:52:52 2002
From: asmodai at unixware.org.uk (asmodai at unixware.org.uk)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 09:52:52 +0000
Subject: [pups] Interesting PDP/Xenix History
Message-ID: <OF13840EFC.5ACB3D21-ON80256B90.00360F84-80256B90.0030C3CE@unixware.org.uk>

Bleh, sorry for the blank post... notes went schitzo....


If MS can release WinCE source, then they would probably do the same for 
XENIX.... both PDP/11 and the x86 version perhaps...
Its not like we want the source... just a tape image would do me :)
Perhaps there is someone in MS who knows of XENIX's existance and can 
help....  I'll have a word with a friend of mine who works there :)
Regards,
Paul.




Frank Wortner <frank at wortner.com>
Sent by: pups-admin at minnie.tuhs.org
04/03/2002 04:31

 
        To:     <asmodai at unixware.org.uk>, <pups at minnie.tuhs.org>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [pups] Interesting PDP/Xenix History


on 4/2/02 5:38 PM, asmodai at unixware.org.uk at asmodai at unixware.org.uk 
wrote:


I wrote to SCO/Caldera a while back about this one...   Here's a quote 
from the mail I got in reply: 

"XENIX will never be released under any license, as it is too full of 
Microsoft copyrights...?

Well,  there?s always the possibility that Microsoft could see fit to make 
a ?hobby? PDP/11 XENIX license available.  Why not?
-- 
Frank

"Don't Blame Me."
* Eeyore,  "Winnie the Pooh"


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20020403/700a9940/attachment.html>

From Fred.van.Kempen at microwalt.nl  Wed Apr  3 19:14:32 2002
From: Fred.van.Kempen at microwalt.nl (Fred N. van Kempen)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:14:32 +0200 
Subject: [pups] Interesting PDP/Xenix History
Message-ID: <6F63E31101C6D41196490008C7B2BFC304B5BC@mwnt4.microwalt.nl>

Paul,

> Bleh, sorry for the blank post... notes went schitzo.... 
*smile*

> If MS can release WinCE source, then they would probably do
> the same for XENIX.... both PDP/11 and the x86 version perhaps... 
> Its not like we want the source... just a tape image would do me :) 
> Perhaps there is someone in MS who knows of XENIX's existance and
> can help....  I'll have a word with a friend of mine who works
> there :) 
Yeah, I agree.  I personally think MS would release Xenix, as it no
longer has any commercial value whatsoever to them.  The hardest part
might be finding people within who know about it, and who can point
us in the right (legalese) direction.  Once MS signs off on it, the
people at SC(O)aldera won't have a problem with releasing the tapes.

Cheers,
	Fred


            InterNetworking en Network Security Consultant
   MicroWalt Corporation (Netherlands), Korte Heul 95, 1403 ND BUSSUM
  Phone +31 (35) 6980059 FAX +31 (35) 6980215  http://WWW.MicroWalt.NL/

Dit  bericht  en  eventuele bijlagen is  uitsluitend  bestemd  voor  de
geadresseerde.  Openbaarmaking,   vermenigvuldiging,  verspreiding  aan
derden  is  niet  toegestaan.   Er   wordt   geen  verantwoordelijkheid 
genomen  voor de juiste en  volledige  overbrenging van  de inhoud  van
dit bericht, noch voor de tijdige ontvangst ervan.


From Fred.van.Kempen at microwalt.nl  Wed Apr  3 19:19:40 2002
From: Fred.van.Kempen at microwalt.nl (Fred N. van Kempen)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:19:40 +0200 
Subject: [pups] SUCCESS: Ultrix-32/VAX V4.5 on TK50 tape
Message-ID: <6F63E31101C6D41196490008C7B2BFC304B5BD@mwnt4.microwalt.nl>

Hi all,

This is a general announcement :)

I have been working on getting to know the format used by the Ultrix-32
"setld" tapes for system (boot) tapes, and I am happy to announce that I
can now create bootable TK50 tapes from any valid Ultrix-32 CD-ROM dist
kit.

Once I get my stuff here sorted out (I am in the midst of redoing all my
computer stuff...) I will post the HOWTO (in PDF format, no less !) and
associated files on my web server.

I was able to successfully install Ultrix-32/VAX V4.5 on a MicroVAX 3300
with TK50 tape and no errors.

Next project is to get the V4.4 or V4.5 source to add CPU support for the
4000 series, and, eventually, add DSSI support for the SHAC chipset.

Anyone have pointers to source kits newer than V4.2 ?

Cheers,
	Fred
-- 
    InterNetworking, Network Security and Communications Consultants 
     MicroWalt Corporation (Netherlands), Postbus 8, 1400 AA BUSSUM 
  Phone +31 (35) 6980059 FAX +31 (35) 6980215  http://WWW.MicroWalt.NL/ 

Dit  bericht  en  eventuele bijlagen is  uitsluitend  bestemd  voor  de 
geadresseerde.  Openbaarmaking,   vermenigvuldiging,  verspreiding  aan 
derden  is  niet  toegestaan.   Er   wordt   geen  verantwoordelijkheid 
genomen  voor de juiste en  volledige  overbrenging van  de inhoud  van 
dit bericht, noch voor de tijdige ontvangst ervan. 


From quapla at xs4all.nl  Wed Apr  3 19:45:05 2002
From: quapla at xs4all.nl (quapla at xs4all.nl)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 11:45:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [pups] Interesting PDP/Xenix History
In-Reply-To: <6F63E31101C6D41196490008C7B2BFC304B5BC@mwnt4.microwalt.nl>
References: <6F63E31101C6D41196490008C7B2BFC304B5BC@mwnt4.microwalt.nl>
Message-ID: <17237.192.18.243.4.1017827105.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>

Ummmm, they can't. Windows XP most likely uses pieces of Xenix to get
it stable. And you know that they will not release sources of the 
windoze O.S-es :=)

Ed


> Paul,
> 
>> Bleh, sorry for the blank post... notes went schitzo.... 
> *smile*
> 
>> If MS can release WinCE source, then they would probably do
>> the same for XENIX.... both PDP/11 and the x86 version perhaps...  Its
>> not like we want the source... just a tape image would do me :) 
>> Perhaps there is someone in MS who knows of XENIX's existance and can
>> help....  I'll have a word with a friend of mine who works
>> there :) 
> Yeah, I agree.  I personally think MS would release Xenix, as it no
> longer has any commercial value whatsoever to them.  The hardest part
> might be finding people within who know about it, and who can point us
> in the right (legalese) direction.  Once MS signs off on it, the people
> at SC(O)aldera won't have a problem with releasing the tapes.
> 
> Cheers,
> 	Fred
> 
> 
>            InterNetworking en Network Security Consultant
>   MicroWalt Corporation (Netherlands), Korte Heul 95, 1403 ND BUSSUM
>  Phone +31 (35) 6980059 FAX +31 (35) 6980215  http://WWW.MicroWalt.NL/
> 
> Dit  bericht  en  eventuele bijlagen is  uitsluitend  bestemd  voor  de
> geadresseerde.  Openbaarmaking,   vermenigvuldiging,  verspreiding  aan
> derden  is  niet  toegestaan.   Er   wordt   geen  verantwoordelijkheid
>  genomen  voor de juiste en  volledige  overbrenging van  de inhoud 
> van dit bericht, noch voor de tijdige ontvangst ervan.
> _______________________________________________
> PUPS mailing list
> PUPS at minnie.tuhs.org
> http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/pups




From jkunz at unixag-kl.fh-kl.de  Wed Apr  3 23:42:41 2002
From: jkunz at unixag-kl.fh-kl.de (Jochen Kunz)
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 15:42:41 +0200
Subject: [pups] SUCCESS: Ultrix-32/VAX V4.5 on TK50 tape
In-Reply-To: <6F63E31101C6D41196490008C7B2BFC304B5BD@mwnt4.microwalt.nl>; from Fred.van.Kempen@microwalt.nl on Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:19:40AM +0200
References: <6F63E31101C6D41196490008C7B2BFC304B5BD@mwnt4.microwalt.nl>
Message-ID: <20020403154241.A23484@unixag-kl.fh-kl.de>

On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 11:19:40AM +0200, Fred N. van Kempen wrote:

> Next project is to get the V4.4 or V4.5 source to add CPU support for the
> 4000 series, 
If I can find a scanner with ADF I can throw in a KA680 TM...

> and, eventually, add DSSI support for the SHAC chipset.

From MichaelDavidson at pacbell.net  Thu Apr  4 02:25:11 2002
From: MichaelDavidson at pacbell.net (Michael Davidson)
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 08:25:11 -0800
Subject: [pups] Interesting PDP/Xenix History
References: <6F63E31101C6D41196490008C7B2BFC304B5BC@mwnt4.microwalt.nl>
Message-ID: <3CAB2CE7.7040403@pacbell.net>

Fred N. van Kempen wrote:

>Paul,
>
>>If MS can release WinCE source, then they would probably do
>>the same for XENIX.... both PDP/11 and the x86 version perhaps... 
>>Its not like we want the source... just a tape image would do me :) 
>>Perhaps there is someone in MS who knows of XENIX's existance and
>>can help....  I'll have a word with a friend of mine who works
>>there :) 
>>
>Yeah, I agree.  I personally think MS would release Xenix, as it no
>longer has any commercial value whatsoever to them.  The hardest part
>might be finding people within who know about it, and who can point
>us in the right (legalese) direction.  Once MS signs off on it, the
>people at SC(O)aldera won't have a problem with releasing the tapes.
>
Microsoft probably wouldn't have any problem releasing the PDP-11 version
of XENIX - it is, after all, really just a minor V7 variant with very 
little Microsoft
code in it.

The two problems you will have are:

- finding anyone at Microsoft who knows what PDP-11 XENIX is,  and 
understands that
  it has no commercial value.

- finding either a binary or source distribution of it


XENIX for the x86 family hasn't quite reached the status of "no 
commercial value" yet.
Caldera still ships XENIX compatibility with the OpenServer operating 
system,
customers still use it, and we still pay Microsoft royalties on every 
copy of OpenServer
that we ship for that very reason.



From lars at fwn.rug.nl  Thu Apr  4 08:12:23 2002
From: lars at fwn.rug.nl (Lars Buitinck)
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 00:12:23 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [pups] UNIX/RT
In-Reply-To: <17237.192.18.243.4.1017827105.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
References: <6F63E31101C6D41196490008C7B2BFC304B5BC@mwnt4.microwalt.nl> <17237.192.18.243.4.1017827105.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl>
Message-ID: <1017871943.3cab7e470d367@w3.fwn.rug.nl>

I think I've found the influence of UNIX/RT on the world at large, and
the Open Sores^V^V^V^Vource community in particular.
from OpenBSD 3.0 /etc/magic:

0       leshort         0401            PDP-11 UNIX/RT ldp

(can anyone tell me what ldp means?)


ps.

Thus spake quapla at xs4all.nl:
> Ummmm, they can't. Windows XP most likely uses pieces of Xenix to get
> it stable. And you know that they will not release sources of the 
> windoze O.S-es :=)

stable?
are we talking about the same OS?

--
If I travelled to the end of the rainbow
As Dame Fortune did intend
Murphy would be there to tell me
The pot is at the other end

Lars


From talmage at madison.onespeeddave.com  Fri Apr 12 04:56:04 2002
From: talmage at madison.onespeeddave.com (David W. Talmage)
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 14:56:04 -0400
Subject: [pups] P11 emulator on the net
Message-ID: <200204111856.g3BIu4v22826@madison.onespeeddave.com>

If you want to play with Harti's p11
running 2.11BSD, you can telnet to
madison.onespeeddave.com on any of
ports 10001 through 10006.

I'll give you an account if you 
want one.  Just tell me what
userid and initial password you
want.  Also tell me what you'll do
with your account.

This flavor of the emulator is
running without a tape drive and 
a network interface card.

FWIF, madison is a 96MB P2-333 running NetBSD.


From asbesto at freaknet.org  Wed Apr 17 19:08:04 2002
From: asbesto at freaknet.org (Asbesto Molesto)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 09:08:04 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [pups] PDP/11 Emulator for MacOS 9?
In-Reply-To: <B8CF734F.4814%frank@wortner.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0204170906390.11089-100000@medialab.freaknet.org>

On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Frank Wortner wrote:

> Since I'm no longer employed,  I don't have access to any Unix or Windows
> boxes to run a PDP/11 emulator.  I do have my home computer: a G4 Mac
> running MacOS 9.1.  Are there any precompiled PDP/11 emulator binaries out
> there?  I've found a nice PDP/8 emulator,  but so far the PDP/11 has eluded

if you have an internet connection, you can telnet medialab.dyndns.org
and try our pdp11 emulator ... i don't know if it's
working now. we installed it about 1-2 years ago :)

p.s. anybody can telnet us and play with our system - hacking is
welcome ! :)

asbesto/freaknet medialab



From helbig at Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE  Fri Apr 19 03:42:24 2002
From: helbig at Informatik.BA-Stuttgart.DE (Wolfgang Helbig)
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 19:42:24 +0200 (MEST)
Subject: [pups] DZ11 and UNIX V6
Message-ID: <200204181753.g3IHr4201344@bsd.korb>

Hi

I tried the latest simulator from Bob Supnik, Simh V2.9-6.
It simulates DZ11 multiline controllers. Are they supported in UNIX V6.

If not, which of the supported ones are closest to DZ11, so I would write
a driver for them.

TIA

Wolfgang



From johnh at psych.usyd.edu.au  Fri Apr 19 12:46:52 2002
From: johnh at psych.usyd.edu.au (John Holden)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:46:52 +1000 (EST)
Subject: [pups] DZ11 and UNIX V6
Message-ID: <200204190246.MAA01324@psychwarp.psych.usyd.edu.au>

> I guess the closest would be the DH-11

The DZ and DH are totally different beasts. The DZ had a 256 word input silo
and interrupt per output character, while the DH was DMA.

There is certainly support for DZ's in V7. It shouldn't be too hard to back port
it to V6


From wkt at minnie.tuhs.org  Fri Apr 19 16:08:27 2002
From: wkt at minnie.tuhs.org (Warren Toomey)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 16:08:27 +1000 (EST)
Subject: [pups] DZ11 and UNIX V6
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204191110330.21564-100000@erai.esi.com.au> from
 Dave Horsfall at "Apr 19, 2002 11:12:46 am"
Message-ID: <200204190608.g3J68St26120@minnie.tuhs.org>

In article by Dave Horsfall	
> On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Wolfgang Helbig wrote	
> 
> > I tried the latest simulator from Bob Supnik, Simh V2.9-6.
> > It simulates DZ11 multiline controllers. Are they supported in UNIX V6.
> 
> Not natively, no.  Back at Uni of NSW, we did several drivers, getting
> better each time, but I think the sources are lost to antiquity (unless
> someone happens to have those old tapes).

Would AUSAM have any DZ11 drivers? There are several AUSAM tapes in
the Unix Archive, and AUSAM was a deriative of V6.

How about	

PDP-11/Distributions/unsw/1/record0.gz	dz.c	12999	1978 01 24
PDP-11/Distributions/unsw/4/record0.gz	dz.c	13416	1979 08 01
PDP-11/Distributions/unsw/6/record0.gz	dz.c	6532	1979 10 30
PDP-11/Distributions/unsw/81/record0.gz	dz.c	4761	1979 12 20
PDP-11/Distributions/unsw/83/record0.gz	dz.c	4761	1979 08 22
PDP-11/Distributions/unsw/92/92.gz	dz.c	7457	1981 09 16

Cheers all,
	Warren


From cyrille.lefevre at laposte.net  Mon Apr 29 09:36:27 2002
From: cyrille.lefevre at laposte.net (Cyrille Lefevre)
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 01:36:27 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [TUHS] rsync down?
Message-ID: <200204282336.g3SNaSXA032419@gits.gits.dyndns.org>

Hi,

rsync doesn't seem to work anymore for some time, now, any idea ?

$ rsync -avz --password-file=.passwd au2496 at minnie.tuhs.org::UA_Root .

rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(151)

same results w/ rsync -avz minnie.tuhs.org::UA_Root .

Cyrille.
-- 
Cyrille Lefevre                 mailto:cyrille.lefevre at laposte.net


From wkt at minnie.tuhs.org  Mon Apr 29 12:31:10 2002
From: wkt at minnie.tuhs.org (Warren Toomey)
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:31:10 +1000 (EST)
Subject: [TUHS] rsync down?
In-Reply-To: <200204282336.g3SNaSXA032419@gits.gits.dyndns.org> from Cyrille
 Lefevre at "Apr 29, 2002 01:36:27 am"
Message-ID: <200204290231.g3T2VBc52296@minnie.tuhs.org>

In article by Cyrille Lefevre:
> Hi,
> 
> rsync doesn't seem to work anymore for some time, now, any idea ?
> 
> $ rsync -avz --password-file=.passwd au2496 at minnie.tuhs.org::UA_Root .
> 
> rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (0 bytes read so far)
> rsync error: error in rsync protocol data stream (code 12) at io.c(151)
> 
> same results w/ rsync -avz minnie.tuhs.org::UA_Root .
> 
> Cyrille.

Rsync got cut off when I was slashdotted a while
ago. I should be able to open it up again. When
I'm back at work tomorrow I will rectify things
and e-mail the list.

Cheers,
	Warren


