YATYRD (was: PalmOS no more? :(

Wed Sep 28 22:10:01 CDT 2005

Good point.  I usually say that to be vintage, it has to be obsolete and
"unique when it was new" -- but then we'd be excluding a lot of the
follow-ups / clones of vintage stuff.  But it we allow that technicality,
the two-part definition pretty much works. 

-----Original Message-----
From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org]
On Behalf Of Zane H. Healy
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 11:03 PM
To: General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts
Subject: Re: YATYRD (was: PalmOS no more? :(

>Well Windows 3.1 IS obsolete on many levels, yet still not "vintage" to 
>people here.

More importantly, it's not very interesting, but then it never was!

	Zane

--
--
| Zane H. Healy                    | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary)    | OpenVMS Enthusiast         |
|                                  | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
|     Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing,    |
|          PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum.         |
|                http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/               |