YATYRD (was: PalmOS no more? :(

Wed Sep 28 21:46:20 CDT 2005

Well Windows 3.1 IS obsolete on many levels, yet still not "vintage" to
people here.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "'Computer Collector Newsletter'" <news at computercollector.com>
To: "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'"
<cctalk at classiccmp.org>
Sent: Wednesday, September 28, 2005 9:57 PM
Subject: RE: YATYRD (was: PalmOS no more? :(

> Vintage is very simple: it must be architecturally obsolete.  Windows 95
> isn't.
>