YATYRD

[woodelf]

Fred Cisin wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Sep 2005, 'Computer Collector Newsletter' wrote:
> 
>>Vintage is very simple: it must be architecturally obsolete.  Windows 95
>>isn't.
> 
> 
> I contend that Windoze95 was obsolete several years before it was
> released.
> 
But what choice did we ( users ) have in the matter?  The PC was
the only affordable while crappy system we had if I remember what
systems I got to use in the 80's and 90's. Sadly only this list
here still talks about *other* machines. Upgrading your PC does
seem to a) What cool neon color your case. b) What USB feature of the 
day. c) Red Hat is the only other OS for your computer other than M$.
Since a lot of people seem to have used better? if not bigger systems
what should we be really running?