Homebrew Circuit Boards: Methods? Supplies?
Holger Veit
holger.veit at ais.fraunhofer.de
Thu Sep 15 03:30:58 CDT 2005
Tony Duell wrote:
>
>Most photoresists can be 'soldered through' so it's not necessary to
>strip them. On the other hand, boards look a lot better if you do strip...
>
>
Besides better look, you'd better strip it in case you want to solder SMDs.
>The method I've always used is to etch the board as usual, wash it, then
>give it another (longer-than-normal) UV exposure with no artwork -- thus
>'fogging' the remaining resist. Then pop it back in the developer and it
>will all strip off nicely. Remember on most photoresist boards, the bits
>that are exposed to UV are the bits you want to etch away (the artwork is
>black for the traces, etc), so the resist that's been exposed is the
>stuff that comes off.
>
>
I am wondering what you have against a stripper like acetone. I have
even used nail varnish remover in the
past which contains acetone, but unfortunately also some soap (which is
not bad) but also some hand-friendly oils
and perfumes, which then require another cleaning with water.
>>So, when using a photoresist system, one needs developer, etchant and
>>stripper. However, I suspect that the stripper, at least, may be
>>some commonly available chemical such as acetone. And I believe that
>>Tony mentioned that developer is usually just a strong alkalai.
>>
>>
>
>It's actally not _that_ strong. Strong enough to feel 'soapy' (it
>hydrolyses the fats in your fingers), but not strong enough to cause an
>alkali burn in my experience.
>
>
>
Infact, sodium hydroxide is not strong in the concentrations used for
developping. The recipe I remember is
7 grams NaOH in 1 litre of water. One can use normal rubber gloves (as
used for cleaning puroses) if one is
afraid to touch the developer. I tried higher concentrations than 7g of
NaOH but this will likely attack also
the unexposed traces - you'll unfortunately encounter this during
etching :-(
Regards
Holger
More information about the cctalk
mailing list