is it just me ? :-)

[John Boffemmyer IV]

Hey now, it isn't lurking if you have nothing positive to add to a 
topic or the topic has little to nothing to do with you.
Now, those IBM clit's/tit mice, that is another story. Even I, the 
self proclaimed ignorant bastard of the group, have dealt with them 
and servicing them (swapping them out, cleaning them, calibration, 
etc). If memory serves correctly, they are also on-topic as they are 
not all that common as one would think (damned touchpads) and meet 
the age rules.
-John Boffemmyer IV

At 11:06 PM 9/9/2005, you wrote:

>Evan wrote...
>>Active, maybe, but more like 1,000 overall.
>Higher.
>
>>When I did my age survey, there were 86 replies. Should we guess : just over
>>100 active members ?
>Probably about right. But it's hard to count. I notice there are a 
>ton of people who lurk. Rarely or never posting. But when something 
>goes wrong with the list I get emails from them quickly. Hence, I 
>know they're there :> So it depends. If by active you mean 
>"conversation and posting", about 100 is probably right. If by 
>active you mean people who regularly read the list, the number is 
>many times that.
>
>Jay
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.19/93 - Release Date: 9/8/2005
>
>
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this incoming message.
>Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
>Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.19/93 - Release Date: 9/8/2005


-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.10.19/93 - Release Date: 9/8/2005