8" floppy system needed to recover old game data

Fred Cisin cisin at xenosoft.com
Sat Oct 8 11:18:32 CDT 2005


On Fri, 7 Oct 2005, Scott Stevens wrote:
> Maybe what's needed is a lower density format and/or a redundant
> filesystem using the current media.  Surely a redundant filesystem or
> lower density encoding scheme that only tried to fit 88K on a 3-1/2" HD
> floppy diskette would succeed in having MUCH greater longetivity.  Maybe
> there's a 'market' for something like that, i.e. a disk format where
> data is written redundantly on ten zones of the drive or something.  It
> really should be mostly a software problem.

Redundant filesystems can help substantially with localized damage.
Unfortunately, they won't help in cases where the entire disk craps out.

FAT filesystems have two copies of the F.A.T.
But,...
1) What is the worst possible place to put the second copy? (adjacent to
the first)
2) For a redundant filesystem to achieve its advantages, there must be
software that can recognize problems, and switch to alternate copies.


There actually exist some floppy R.A.I.D. implementations!
Depending on configuration, that could provide full recoverability,
if only one disk fails at a time.




More information about the cctalk mailing list