8" floppy system needed to recover old game data
Scott Stevens
chenmel at earthlink.net
Fri Oct 7 00:24:04 CDT 2005
On Fri, 7 Oct 2005 06:56:49 +0200
"Nico de Jong" <nico at FARUMDATA.DK> wrote:
> Fra: "Chuck Guzis" <cclist at sydex.com>
> >
> > That said, give me 8" diskettes any day over 5.25" and 3.5" when it
> > comes to
> reliability. I've got diskettes from 1976 that read as well as when
> they were new. I have 3.5" DSHD diskettes that won't read right a
> month after purchase.
> >
>
> I couldnt have said that better
>
> Nico
>
>
Think about the density of the data on the diskettes (this is not a
comment meant as a defense for the poor quality of magnetic media, just
part of the discussion) A 1.44M floppy diskette puts a lot more data in
a smaller area. The highest density 8" media I ever had was DSDD, or
720K on the big 8" surface. That's a LOT larger disk and hence a much
lower density.
Plus, the world of computers today has a lot more room for
junk/commodity media. Anybody using floppy diskettes in 1976 had
serious heavy-duty reasons for doing so. And those diskettes were
EXPENSIVE. The disks you can get now at the Walgreens or a grocery
store aren't the same. Further, there's no market for a high quality
diskette, because 'high quality' customers have moved on to newer
mediums.
I got handed a new shrinkwrapped box of 8" diskettes recently at work.
Finally everybody there is getting to know I am the person to hand stuff
to. I'm soon to get a nice desktop HP pen plotter, too.
More information about the cctalk
mailing list