Pinout for SED9421
Allison
ajp166 at bellatlantic.net
Fri Nov 25 22:11:31 CST 2005
>
>Subject: Pinout for SED9421
> From: lee davison <leeedavison at yahoo.co.uk>
> Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:50:31 +0000 (GMT)
> To: cctalk <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>> Figures.. However they loose a full sector for every four
>> which is pretty bad considering sync and other overhead that
>> floppies incur.
>
>It's not that clever. One 2K block of data per track, no sectors,
>no sync, just the 125Kb/s async bitstream. Wait for the index
>pulse and read/write the whole track. At the time it was a lot
>cheaper than any other disk controller.
>
>Lee.
They trade being efficient for a lot. Across 35 tracks (sa400) thats
about 18k. NS* hard sector was 10x256 (2560bytes) track, and a
sync chip (one sector per track) will give that much maybe more
as well.
I think what they did was very clever and dirt cheap and the hidden feature
of async is the extra two bit times allows a bit more time to read/write the
port 80uS vs 64uS typical.
Wacky, but soon as you said OSI.. ;) they were a creative lot.
Allison
More information about the cctalk
mailing list