8008?
Allison
ajp166 at bellatlantic.net
Tue Nov 15 21:29:55 CST 2005
>
>Subject: Re: 8008?
> From: "Jim Kearney" <jim at jkearney.com>
> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 21:35:15 -0500
> To: "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts" <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
>
>> I reviewed my old BGMicro orders and found it to be LED1059, which
>> is no longer available.
>
>There don't seem to be any ready sources for this particular display, but I
>found that Osram apparently took over Siemens' opto products and *still*
>lists an very similar device, the PD353x series:
>
>http://catalog.osram-os.com/catalogue/catalogue.do?catGroupOid=0000000000024e2600080023&favOid=0000000000024e2600080023&act=showProductGroups
>
>I should locate some of these and do a Tiny-8 PCB run, but I also am lacking
>8008's ;-(
>
I have an 8008 and HDSP2132 (8 char version). Wire wrap and a software
patch will have to do.
The 8008 appeard in one place thats common the 11/34 KY11 programmers pannel.
Possibly others.
I may not duplicate the design exact;y as you did it. Rather than memory
mapped I may implement IO ports. However looking at your design there
there some design simplifications that hadn't occured to me last 8008
project (1974). It's pretty cool and saves a carload of chips. Most
people back then were implementing multiple busses (address, ram data,
IO in, IO out, interrupt instuction) and thats a lot of chips. The MCS-8
is a really good example of getting carried away with multiple busses.
I hadn't looked at that chip in years and that was a different
perspective.
You could create a CPU, memory and IO card set.
Allison
More information about the cctalk
mailing list