Software find

[Eric J Korpela]

On 11/10/05, Adrian Graham <witchy at binarydinosaurs.co.uk> wrote:

> Wouldn't mind seeing windows 101 myself, though it's just a glorified
> DOSSHELL running on top of DOS 5. 'ugly' doesn't do it justice!
>

I think you mean DOS 3.2. At least windows v1.0x could multitask well
behaved (i.e. i/o through BIOS) text mode applications. (On my V30 machine I
used to compile in the background while playing C-robots in the foreground
on an 800x600 interlaced display). Multitasking had to wait for
windows 3.0to reappear, and then you needed a 386.