zip (was: Re: Disk archival techniques)
Jim Leonard
trixter at oldskool.org
Thu May 19 12:35:02 CDT 2005
On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 07:34:24AM -0700, Vintage Computer Festival wrote:
>
> > You can not plan on what is the next best archival tool and you can't
> > please everyone. Use what you have and try to make it so most people can
> > handle it one way or another.
>
> My suggestion is to stay away from proprietary compressed binary formats.
*Everything* is a proprietary binary format, and in the grand scheme
of things, compression is simply a binary encoding. That's why I
think damning a certain archiving program/format just because of the
platform it runs onis silly.
I see people on the thread complaining about having to bundle a
windows emulator with each archive. Excuse me? Let's look at some
popular formats: TAR, ZIP, RAR all have source-code unarchivers.
Which means they can run on any machine with a C compiler. So
what's with all the paranoia? Just use whatever works as long as
more than one major platform can extract it.
(Not directed at Sellam, just commenting on all thread participants.)
--
Jim Leonard http://www.oldskool.org/ Email: trixter at oldskool.org
Like PC games? Help support the MobyGames database: http://www.mobygames.com/
Or taste a slice of the demoscene at http://www.mindcandydvd.com/
More information about the cctalk
mailing list