'goto" gone from computer languages or is it!

[Jerome H. Fine]

 >Antonio Carlini wrote:

>[Snip]
>I think gcc 3.3 spots this kind of thing (and the
>other common variant:
>  a[++i] = ++i;
>
Jerome Fine replies:

I assume that the above statement could have two possible
interpretations:

(a)  j = ++i;  k = ++i;  a[j] = k;
(b)  j = ++i;  k = ++i;  a[k] = j;

(i)  Are there any other interpretations?  If so, what is the equivalent code?
(ii) Does gcc 3.3 produce a warning or an error message?

Sincerely yours,

Jerome Fine
--
If you attempted to send a reply and the original e-mail
address has been discontinued due a high volume of junk
e-mail, then the semi-permanent e-mail address can be
obtained by replacing the four characters preceding the
'at' with the four digits of the current year.