On Wed, 11 May 2005, Paul Koning wrote: > Hm. Algol 60 certainly has no OO nature. Algol 68 does, the > beginnings of it. I don't mean to imply anyone in 1964 saw this, I'm only saying after looking at the compiler design it seemed 'obvious' to me language extentions to accomodate scope at the top level could fit without ruining it.