DEC M8350 - KA8E posibus interface
Joe R.
rigdonj at cfl.rr.com
Wed Jun 22 07:50:05 CDT 2005
At 11:58 PM 6/21/05 +0100, you wrote:
>> Also... does anyone know about the differences between 4116 and 4164
>> chips enough to answer the question if one could use 4164s as long as
>> one a) prevents the non-TTL supplies from reaching the chips (modify
>
>What you need to do is isolate pins 1 and 8 from the board and reconnect
>pin 8 to +5V IIRC
>
> 4116 4164
>1 -5V N/C
>8 +12V +5V
>9 +5V A7
>
>That leaves the extra address line tied high, so you only use 1/4 of the chip
>
>> board, modify sockets, modify pins...) and b) possibly tie up or tie
>> down the extra multiplexed address input. Can you refresh 1/4 of a
>> 4164 and have just that part stay refreshed? I ask because I have a
>
>There were 2 types of 64K DRAM. One of them used 7 bit refresh (same as
>the 4116, on the same pins), the other, older/rarer one need all 8
>address lines to be used for the refresh (this was a royal pain on
>Z80-based machines, where the CPU provides a 7 bit refresh only).
Tony,
This is good info. Someone should post it as a mini-FAQ.
Do you have any info on which ones used 7 bit refresh and which ones used
8 bit refresh?
Joe
>
>I have personally replaced the odd 4116 with a 4164 as I've just
>described and had no problems. Maybe I've been lucky in finding 7-bit
>refresh chips (which are the more common type), maybe it works anyway.
>
>> serious wad of new 4164s from COMBOARD stock, but 128Kw of 4116s (8 x
>> 12) is more than I have lying around.
>>
>
>-tony
>
More information about the cctalk
mailing list