OT: RE: Apple Goes Intel...

[Eric Smith]

Jules wrote:
> That was in interesting point raised in an article that I saw; why did
> Apple go for Intel and not AMD? AMD chips tend to be cheaper, plus they
> seem to always be slightly ahead of the game when it comes to
> performance and innovation (which seems to fit in more with Apple's
> roots).

There's no reason to believe that they won't use AMD chips.  Intel has
a better low-power product for laptops (Pentium M/Celeron), and that's
what they are starting with.