GPL or BSD: What license do you prefer for the MSCP SCSI project?

[Zane H. Healy]

>List members,
>   I reach the point that I need to decide what license I will use when
>I release my project. I myself do not have a preference. I am planning
>to replace the unknown-license 53C90 sample code with linux or NetBSD
>53C90 driver code. If I use the linux code, I have to release it with
>GPL. If I use the NetBSD code, I  am not able to release it in GPL. I
>will let you guys decide, since you are the end users. To avoid
>flooding the mailing list, you can send me private email if you do not
>have a public message.
>   When I release the project, only 512 B/B CDROM and HD will be
>supported. There might be a need to add support for other format
>CDROMs (easy) or SCSI tapes (difficult) or other devices down the
>road. Bear this in mind when you vote.
>
>cheers,
>vax, 9000

Well, I'm a potential user[1], after all, I am definitely interested 
in MSCP SCSI :^)  My vote is for a BSD style license.

		Zane

[1] I must confess I'm less of a potential user than many people here 
with DEC HW as I use Viking QDT and UDT boards, however, I've watched 
this when I have time with interest.
-- 
--
| Zane H. Healy                    | UNIX Systems Administrator |
| healyzh at aracnet.com (primary)    | OpenVMS Enthusiast         |
| MONK::HEALYZH (DECnet)           | Classic Computer Collector |
+----------------------------------+----------------------------+
|     Empire of the Petal Throne and Traveller Role Playing,    |
|          PDP-10 Emulation and Zane's Computer Museum.         |
|                http://www.aracnet.com/~healyzh/               |