Dolch V.P.A.C. 386-SX or portables.

[jpero at sympatico.ca]

> From:          "Gil Carrick" <gilcarrick at comcast.net>
> To:            "'General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts'"
>                <cctalk at classiccmp.org>
> Date:          Fri, 26 Aug 2005 22:35:08 -0500
> Subject:       RE: Dolch V.P.A.C. 386-SX or portables.
> Reply-to:      "General Discussion: On-Topic and Off-Topic Posts"
>                <cctalk at classiccmp.org>

> The Dolch boxes I saw were Sniffers, and were very similar to the Compaq
> III. An IBM "AT" board was huge, but the clone industry sort of hit on a
> "baby AT" form factor that was much smaller and pretty standard. 
> 
> HTH,
> 
> Gil

WHOOPS! I was thinking AT where i meant baby AT. :)  So does this 
dolch lunchbox fit baby AT boards?

The keyboard hole, 7 slots in right places suggests strongly baby AT 
factor but I wanted to confirm.

Cheers, Wizard 

> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org 
> > [mailto:cctalk-bounces at classiccmp.org] On Behalf Of jpero at sympatico.ca
> > Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 6:25 PM
> > To: cctalk at classiccmp.org
> > Subject: Dolch V.P.A.C. 386-SX or portables.
> > 
> > What I'm wondering about is is this dolch lunchbox can take a 
> > standard AT boards or not?
> > 
> > I saw this on ebay and I was wondering because google didn't 
> > turn up photos of innards of these Dolch lunchboxes.
> > 
> > Was looking to outfit a lunchbox with my parts laying around.  
> > (386DX, all the goodies.)
> > 
> > Eurocom did have a cached 386DX LCD semi-notebook that takes 3.5" 1" 
> > height HD.  I have seen one before and it's innards.  Know of 
> > one of those?
> > 
> > Cheers, Wizard
>