minor list changes

der Mouse mouse at Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA
Sun Mar 6 01:34:17 CST 2005


>>> Except for someone trying to run a service out of their house.  To
>>> do so, is... well...
>> [...]?
> Trying to do it off a line with dynamic address assignment -

...which != "out of their house"; for example, my mailserver is in my
condo, but addressed out of a statically assigned /28 - which is
SWIPped and has rDNS delegated to me.

> fighting DSL bottlenecks at the DSLAM, etc. etc.

So far this hasn't proven to be a problem.  Averaging over the last 30
days, I have used 3158.7 bytes/sec incoming, 2235.1 bytes/sec outgoing
(both figures in error by less than 1 unit in the last place shown,
assuming netstat is telling the truth about byte counts).

Certainly my DSLAM could in principle be maxed out, but that seems
unlikely; more likely would be that my wire would be maxed out,
something that doesn't seem to happen in practice - at least not
unexpectedly.  (I have for example deliberately redlined it when
stress-testing it or the networks adjacent to it; I don't count that.)

> Is simply not the best way to run a mail server.

Actually, for me, I believe it is the best way to run a mailserver.

That is, of course, taking into account issues such as cost.  Yes, if
cost were not an issue, I agree there would be ways in which it could
be run better.  But I daresay the same could be said of almost any
mailserver in existence.

> I'm not saying people shouldn't do it actually.  I'm merely saying
> that when it's done under those conditions, it's hard to complain
> about sporadic problems.

Perhaps - but my experience over the past few years has been that I
have fewer problems inbound to my mailserver than through other
mailservers which forward to me.

Now, that could be just a question of what I view as "problems", and
where I see the problem as lying when I see a problem as present.  But
since it's my mailserver, it's my metric of goodness too.

/~\ The ASCII				der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
 X  Against HTML	       mouse at rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email!	     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B


More information about the cctalk mailing list