PC/Apple/etc. Cards Worth Keeping/Storing
Tony Duell
ard at p850ug1.demon.co.uk
Thu Apr 28 17:23:40 CDT 2005
> The other reason to keep original IBM PC cards is that the schematics
> and tech info are published, so they're easy to modify and/or use for
Agreed.
> special purposes, like the disk conversion devices and functions people
> are always talking about here. It's pretty easy to make an original IBM
> Floppy Controller work with anything that the 765 controller will talk
> to.
Although some of the clone cards with a 765 and that little 8 pin data
separator chip (9216 IIRC) were also very hackable.
>
> I hope I'm not the only person with a fairly complete IBM-published
> hardware 'technical reference' set for the PC/XT/AT line.
Depends on what you mean by 'complete'. I have :
PC
PC/XT and Portable
AT (with the update for the 8MHz board, later BIOS, etc), it ended up in
2 binders)
These are the later manuals covering just the mainboard, keyboard, PSU.
But then I also have :
Options and Adapters (2 volumes) covering the cards, monitors, drives for
the PC and XT
AT supplement for the O&A manual
Scinetific Options and Adapters (GPIB, data aquisition, Professional
graphics)
EGA Techref
PCjr Trechref
All the above are real manauls with schematics, BIOS listings, etc in them.
PS/2 Hardware Interface Techref -- no scheamtics, no source code, but
better than nothing. It was given to me by a firend, so I am not going to
complain.
I also have the Hardware Maintenance and Service manaul for the AT. It's
a boardswapper guid, but it was given to me (I bought the AT Techref
second-hand, it came with it). It actually has some useful info on
repairing the 5152 printer (== Epson MX80, basically).
I don't have all the O&A suplements, and I don't have the XT/286 techref,
although that machine is pretty close the AT in hardware.
-tony
More information about the cctalk
mailing list