MFM/RLL data recovery
Ryan Underwood
nemesis-lists at icequake.net
Mon Apr 4 19:12:10 CDT 2005
Replying to a bundle of posts:
> IBM used a twisted cable with their hard disks - in order to avoid having
> to explain "Drive Select" jumpers to their [Computerland level] dealers.
>
> The hard drive cable twist is NOT the same twist as for floppies!
Oops. See, I saw a mention of a twisted cable in the Miniscribe manual
which came from Hard Drives International, so I thought I was okay
there.
Anyway, I switched to a straight through connection. I tried the
Miniscribe drives with the 27X and the ST-238R with both the 27X and the
WD1002SV-SR2. With the 27X I get no POST/BIOS complaints, but the
system tries to go to ROM BASIC, so I guess it is ignoring the connected
drive. With the WD1002SV with BIOS disabled and 615/4/26 entered, then
I just get Drive C: error from the BIOS.
> If you are trying to recover files you are probably wasting your time, the
> XT controllers used unique formatting and you will never read the data off
> of the drives without using controllers indentical with ones used
> originally. It is not good enough to use the same brand or even chipset.
Is that true for MFM drives too? I know RLL setups were picky about
controller/drive compatibility but I didn't think MFM would be also.
> Another problem I had with early MFM hard drives was they needed to be
> read with the same model of controller that formatted them.
... I guess so.
> For the ST225 look for a DTC 5150 or a western digital 1002-WX1 HD
> controller. These were two of the most common HD controllers for XTs.
Thanks. I'll ask the owners if these models ring any bells.
> I doubt that you can read them with any of the 16 bit cards.
Are drives formatted with 16 bit cards generally compatible with each
other?
> When I put away any XT drives that I wanted the data off I kept the
> cables and controller card with the drive.
Yup. I certainly wish that were the case here.
> I have docs for the WD cards. The 27X sounds (without looking) like an RLL
> controller.
It is.
> Wrong 34-pin cable. Also check the markings on the controllers and the
> drives very carefully for the pin 1 identification. Perhaps all the solder
> pads are round, except for one which is deliberately square, (that's pin 1)
> or maybe it's silk screened on the board/drive.
It is actually silk screened on all these boards. No problems there.
--
Ryan Underwood, <nemesis at icequake.net>
More information about the cctalk
mailing list