Byte sizes
Tom Peters
tpeters at mixcom.com
Mon Mar 14 17:06:26 CST 2005
Off topic:
What's really interesting is that the conversation below earned a rating of
two chilli peppers from my mail program for possible offensive language! I
looked hard for cuss words, naughty bits, rude implications, etc. and
didn't see any. The message it is in reply to didn't earn any chillies.
Hmmm....
At 01:56 PM 3/14/2005 -0800, you wrote:
>On Mon, 14 Mar 2005, Eric Smith wrote:
>
>>Any size from 0 to 36 bits.
>
>
>Yeah, why is everyone so hung up on defining "byte"? It's not like
>it's part of some natural order. It's whatever the designers made
>up off the top of their head for some particular task.
>
>It's utterly arbitrary. There's varied interaction with the
>'character' unit over time, but the two are not the same.
>Sometimes they coincide; often they do not.
>
>And with UNICODE, who cares any more? Byte don't mean shit no
>more, it's just an historic leftover.
>
>* When you ask how many bits in a byte, you have to ask "for what
> machine?".
>
>6-bit characters encompass the old ITA2 (aka "baudot") teleprinter
>codes, which were five bits (*) plus a state maintained in
>parallel in both sender and receiver (aka FIGS and LTRS). Five
>bits fits the roman alphabet 26 letters plus a few punctuation
>characters.
>
>
>
>(*) Rarely did anyone people before approx. WWII consider the five
>time intervals that make up the data portion of a
>telegraph/teletype character to be "bits". That's a modern
>interpretation.
[Computing] A successful tool is one that was used to do something
undreamed of by its author. --S. C. Johnson
--... ...-- -.. . -. ----. --.- --.- -...
tpeters at nospam.mixcom.com (remove "nospam") N9QQB (amateur radio)
"HEY YOU" (loud shouting) WEB ADDRESS http//www.mixweb.com/tpeters
43° 7' 17.2" N by 88° 6' 28.9" W, Elevation 815', Grid Square EN53wc
WAN/LAN/Telcom Analyst, Tech Writer, MCP, Cisco Certified CCNA
More information about the cctalk
mailing list