minor list changes

[John Foust]

At 04:47 AM 3/7/2005, Eric Smith wrote:
>I don't see how it "spreads the load" or how the spammer benefits
>in any way.  The spammer wants to get the spam to as many valid
>email addresses as possible, but sending to the backup MX doesn't
>get it to more valid email addresses, and it doesn't reduce the
>load on the spammer's sending machine.

Were they talking about relaying and authenticating senders, or 
about sending to a user at the MX[n] host?

- John