7201 (was Re: Z8530 (was Re: Navtel 9460 Protocol
Analyzerinfo?))
Allison
ajp166 at bellatlantic.net
Sat Apr 16 15:16:36 CDT 2005
>
>Subject: Re: 7201 (was Re: Z8530 (was Re: Navtel 9460 Protocol Analyzerinfo?))
> From: Ben Franchuk <bfranchuk at jetnet.ab.ca>
>> The Zilog SIO types are fine by me. The yard sale full of assorted
>> and scattered registers is annoying, but programmers opinions
>> don't count. It does pretty much everything required for
>> full-featured async. At least it does what you tell it to.
They seem to. Darn things were never cheap though but being two
for one made them tolerable if you needed two.
>Well I favor dumb chips at the moment because I don't have
>several MEG or EPROM to bootstrap my HOMEBREW computer.Infact I have
>no PROM of any kind, just toogle switches*. Since I favor a 6809
>style of memory access** I am using 68B50's. I just need to finish
>the CPU logic design and build it. :)
I kinda liked that one to. The MITS 2SIO card used them and it worked
very well. That was for 8080, works well for 8085 too.
Allison
More information about the cctalk
mailing list