Harvard vs. vonNeuman
Paul Koning
pkoning at equallogic.com
Tue Sep 28 17:13:02 CDT 2004
>>>>> "David" == David V Corbin <dvcorbin at optonline.net> writes:
David> As many of you have pointed out there have been tools for
David> generating programs from within programs for a long
David> time. There have also been many programming environments which
David> did not need a complete compiler.
David> To the best of my knowledge, the Microsoft .NET platform is
David> the first run-time environment [not development environment]
David> in which a compiler, linker and all of the associated
David> capabilities are included. If you have a windows machine [XP,
David> 2K] and have applied the windowsupdates, then all of these
David> tools are already resident on your machines!
You mean -- as opposed to having to install a developer's package for
it?
If that's what you mean, then the answer is no, not by many decades.
Unix boxes pretty much uniformly come with all that. BASIC systems
always had it, as did LISP boxes, or FORTH systems. All that goes
back to the 1970s if not before. And of course, any large machine
(timesharing or batch) has always had all this stuff as a matter of
course. The closest you might come is that some of these systems
would offer some languages standard, and some as extra cost options.
Developer's kits are largely a PC invention, I would say.
paul
More information about the cctalk
mailing list