On Fri, 2004-11-12 at 17:54 -0500, Paul Koning wrote: > I would hope the scans are TIFF, not JPG. JPG images are generally > blurry, especially if the original had sharp black & white contrast. > JPG is NOT fit for that job. Well *we* know that :-) Given that it was mentioned that they've only been scanned at 200dpi, anything's possible...